The Recommendation Was Rejected, KY Will Sue The MA

VIVAnews -Judicial Commission plan will submit a dispute between the State institutions (SKLN) to the Constitutional Court to ask for the assessment of whether the meeting Chairman MA reserves the right to drop the verdict against the recommendation of KY.

"Why rapim? It is not the trial judge, it rapim the administrative leadership of MA nature, not the Assembly, not the judge, that the administrative decision. The verdict of the trial verdict, KY code of ethics, no sense when it was decided in an administrative meeting, "said Commissioner KY, KY House Taufiqurrahman Matt Shorr, Jakarta, Monday 5 September 2011.

According to Taufiq, filing the petition that will be done when the SKLN MA rejected the recommendation of KY to drop sanctions for judges who hear the cases of former Chairman of the corruption eradication Commission, Antasari Azhar in meetings led by MA. "We are waiting for the official stance of the MA. If rapim refuses to be the one that later we are talking about, "he said.

In the meantime, Commissioner KY, Suparman Marzuki said the recommendations have been precise. KY The reason, in the plenary session was the former weigh on eksaminasi cases and the execution of the code of conduct of the profession of judge the judges who hear cases Antasari, instead of the verdict the judge concerned.

"We believe the verdict Of KY plenary are correct, that the judge should be liable for the rule mandated, and judges could potentially violate the authority," said Suparman.

According to Suparman, a judge has a responsibility and obligation to uphold the law in a fair in the trial. If not then there should be sanctions meted out to the judge.

"One of them is the judge had ignored its obligations as a holder of power of the judiciary to enforce the law in a fair, then the target of sanctions is not putusannya, judges do," he said.

As known, the Supreme Court could not follow up on the recommendation of the judicial Commission to provide sanctions for judges who handled the case Antasari Azhar. Although the Supreme Court has yet to roll out meeting leaders to discuss recommendations KY.

"We have not yet meeting the leadership but we've already taken the conclusion that it could not dilanjuti," said Chairman MA Harifin a. Tumpa, Friday, August 26, 2011.

According to the judicial Commission's recommendations, Harifin could not actionable because it concerns the judicial technical. Affirmed, the decision of judge Harifin besifat independent. How about a suspected violation of the judge? "It is the process of law, later being processed," said Harifin.

Previously, KY recommends that the Supreme Court dropped the sanctions to judges. The three judges of the process in the former case first degree i.e. Herry Swantoro, Ibnu Prasetyo, and Nugroho Setiadji. All three is the examining magistrate in the court case Antasari Azhar South Jakarta State.

According to Imam, recommendations are sent to these recommendations was MA or term non hammer. It means that judges should not be handling the matter for six months. (umi)

• VIVAnews

Peliculas Online